SARB imposes administrative sanctions on Old Mutual Life Assurance Company

The SARB on Friday said the administrative sanctions imposed on OMLACSA were due to its failure to comply with certain provisions of the FIC Act. Picture: Sihle Mlambo/IOL

The SARB on Friday said the administrative sanctions imposed on OMLACSA were due to its failure to comply with certain provisions of the FIC Act. Picture: Sihle Mlambo/IOL

Published Sep 30, 2024

Share

THE South African Reserve Bank (SARB) has imposed administrative sanctions on Old Mutual Life Assurance Company South Africa (OMLACSA) as a result of its non-compliance with the provisions of the Financial Intelligence Centre Act 38 of 2001 (FIC Act), following a FIC Act inspection conducted in 2020.

The SARB on Friday said the administrative sanctions imposed on OMLACSA were due to its failure to comply with certain provisions of the FIC Act and consist of four cautions and a financial penalty totalling R15.9 million, of which R5.9m is conditionally suspended for a period of 36 months as from July 23, 2024.

The administrative sanctions imposed stem from the following non-compliance:

a. OMLACSA failed to comply with its customer due diligence obligations in terms of sections 21 and/or 21A to 21H of the FIC Act in that it failed to conduct due diligence on sampled active customer relationships.

The non-compliance, inter-alia, included failures to verify the physical address of clients and identify the beneficial owners of clients.

The PA imposed a caution not to repeat the conduct which led to the non-compliance and a financial penalty of R6m, of which R2m is conditionally suspended for a period of 36 months.

b. OMLACSA failed to comply with its cash threshold reporting obligations in terms of section 28 of the FIC Act, read with FIC Act Regulations 22B, 22C and 24(4), in that it failed to timeously report cash transactions above the prescribed limit to the FIC.

The PA imposed a caution not to repeat the conduct which led to the non-compliance and a financial penalty of R4.9, of which R1.9m is conditionally suspended for a period of 36 months.

c. OMLACSA failed to timeously report on suspicious and unusual transactions to the FIC in compliance with its suspicious and unusual transaction reporting (STR) obligations in terms of section 29 of the FIC Act, read with FIC Act Regulation 24(3).

The PA imposed a caution not to repeat the conduct which led to the non-compliance.

d. OMLACSA failed to comply with section 42 of the FIC Act in that it failed to adequately develop and implement its Risk Management and Compliance Programme (RMCP), including to:

i. identify, assess and monitor its money laundering, terrorist financing and proliferation financing (ML/TF/PF) risks;

ii. adequately risk rate clients prior to onboarding;

iii. evidence that the ML/TF risk rating methodology is applied consistently;

iv. implement its secondary ML/TF risk indicators;

v. evidence that it had documented its consideration of local geographical location risks; and

vi. adequately implement anti-money laundering and countering the financing of terrorism (AML/CFT) obligations and controls in relation to its CDD, CTR and STR obligations.

The PA imposed a caution not to repeat the conduct which led to the non-compliance and a financial penalty of R5m, of which R2m is conditionally suspended for a period of 36 months.

The PA confirms that OMLACSA co-operated with the PA throughout the process and has undertaken the necessary remedial action to address all the identified compliance deficiencies and control weaknesses.

BUSINESS REPORT