Court rules against Grand West Casino after child electrocuted in 2020 incident

Sunwest International, trading as Grand West Casino in Cape Town, is liable for the injuries of a child electrocuted by a live wire while holding a metal rail at the mini ice-skating rink.

The child's father, who remains unnamed due to her status as a minor, has filed a damages claim against the casino in the Western Cape High Court following the January 2020 incident, when his daughter was four years old.

The father testified that the incident occurred during the festive season and the food court at Grand West was bustling with foot traffic and children.

His child was standing next to him at the kiddies ice-skating rink, holding on to a steel pole when she suddenly cried out loud.

He looked at his child and could see her visibly trembling.

He then pulled her towards him while she was screaming and at the same time showing him her hand.

He took a moment to survey the surroundings and noticed an exposed electrical wire lying on the floor. A red mark was visible on his child's hand. He then concluded that his child had been electrocuted.

The floor manager of Grand West Casino arrived on the scene and asked him what had transpired.

The security wanted to switch off the main electricity plug point, which was a few meters away from where the ice-skating rink was stationed, but was prevented from doing so as they first needed to do an incident report.

The paramedics arrived, examined his child, and applied some burn gel to her hand and under her feet. Thereafter, he took his child to the emergency medical centre, the father testified.

A security guard testified that he saw the father cradling his weeping child in his arms. He then noticed a white electrical cable with one connector block. He also noticed a red live wire, which was not insulated, protruding outside of the connector block.

The court said that considering the nature of the casino’s business and the public's expectation for safety at the premises, and the lack of any explanation regarding whether it was safe after the Christmas tree was removed, it is clear that the defendant was grossly negligent.

Had the electrical and maintenance department conducted a thorough inspection and secured the area after the Christmas tree had been removed, not only would the live wire have been seen and removed, but the child would also not have been electrocuted, the court said.

The issue of how much damages the defendant must pay was meanwhile postponed indefinitely.

Get your news on the go, click here to join the Cape Argus News WhatsApp channel.

Cape Argus